عنوان مقاله [English]
One of the most significant concepts associated with commentary and sometimes synonymous with that word is the word paraphrase. Concerning the paraphrase, there are many views that are "synonymous with commentary," "avoiding the meaning of appearance means counter-appearance," and, finally, "implication of the ventricle", are the most important views. Given the fact that the viewpoint of the implication of the ventricle is less credible, it is confirmed with several reasons. One of the most significant reasons for this is the Qur'anic verses and related narratives. However, the ambiguity of the concept of "ventricle" is not less than the ambiguity of the notion of "paraphrase." And the same thing makes the story of "paraphase" more complicated. Somebody are very simple and superficial, alongside "ventricle" and "paraphrase." And they are undergoing a process that leads to a negation of "ventricle" and "paraphrase." Allameh Tabatabai has a semantic look to "paraphrase," and an ontological look, to "ventricle". Which this issue requires analysis and explanation. This research seeks to comparative assessmentthe two concepts of "ventricle" and "paraphrase" in two aspects of ontological and semantic. And this investigation proves that both of the cases, based on the view of Allamah Tabatabai (RA) and Imam Khomeini (RA), as two outstanding contemporary commentators based on the cognitive and epistemological attitude can be viewed.