Abstract

One of the fundamental issues in the interpretation of religious texts, especially the interpretation of the Qur'an, is the issue of understanding. Various interpretations have been made in the field of understanding. Some of these lectures are based on the author-centered approach, some are text-oriented and some are commentator-centered. The central commentator considers the position of the interpreter beyond the comprehensor and considers only the interpreter involved in constructing the meaning of the text. The purpose of this article is to explain the disadvantages of the central interpreter in the category of understanding and interpreting the Qur'an. The present study has descriptively-analytically examined the achievements of the use of interpreter-centered thought in understanding the Qur'an and expressed its disadvantages. Author and disbelief in the objectivity of meaning.

Abstract

One of the fundamental issues in the interpretation of religious texts, especially the interpretation of the Qur'an, is the issue of understanding. Various interpretations have been made in the field of understanding. Some of these lectures are based on the author-centered approach, some are text-oriented and some are commentator-centered. The central commentator considers the position of the interpreter beyond the comprehensor and considers only the interpreter involved in constructing the meaning of the text. The purpose of this article is to explain the disadvantages of the central interpreter in the category of understanding and interpreting the Qur'an.